Get The Latest!

 Subscribe Via Feed!

Enter email address to subscribe:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Follow scottfactor on Twitter
Archives

Posts Tagged ‘Religious Radical’

The following was written by Gina Miller. Her opinions don’t necessarily reflect those of ScottFactor.com, but because they’re here, they probably do.

Well knock me down with a feather!  Who could’ve seen this coming? 

Our President!

Barack Obama continues to show his rear end to the United States, and on Friday at a White House Islamic celebration dinner in front of a group of Muslims, he gave his strong support for the construction of a monster mosque next to Ground Zero in New York. 

During his remarks, Obama employed the classic Islamic tactic of taqiyya, or religious deception, in the false statements he made.  Of course, it could easily be argued that when Obama lies, he’s speaking his native language. 

He brought up the proposed Ground Zero mosque and said, 

“But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country.  And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the Founders must endure.”

So, Obama suddenly cares about the laws of the Founders?  Yeah, right.  This is not a freedom of religion issue.  The construction of buildings has nothing to do with the First Amendment to the Constitution.  Islamists are free to practice their detestable “religion” here in America, but no one is free to construct a building any darned where they please!  And there are plenty of questions surrounding the process of approval for the mosque by the city of New York, and there will be legal challenges to it. 

Obama also stated, 

“And let us also remember who we’re fighting against, and what we’re fighting for. Our enemies respect no religious freedom. Al Qaeda’s cause is not Islam -– it’s a gross distortion of Islam. These are not religious leaders -– they’re terrorists who murder innocent men and women and children.” 

I’m wondering who he means by “our enemies.”  Islamists do not respect freedom of religion–not at all.  And Al Qaeda is Islam.  They are not distorting it!  That’s taqiyya 101–the claim that terrorists have hijacked Islam, and that Islam is a religion of peace; those are lies from the pit of hell. 

Obama’s whoppers continued, 

“And tonight, we are reminded that Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity. And Ramadan is a reminder that Islam has always been a part of America.” 

What is he talking about?  Diversity?  Is he kidding?  Where is the “diversity” in Islam, with its hellish, murderous hatred for Jewish people and Christians?  And how does he figure that Islam has “always been a part of America?”  Maybe he means the Muslim Barbary pirates who, in the 18th and early 19th centuries, attacked our merchant ships and killed and enslaved the men on board.  Even then, those African Muslims were not a part of America; nor were there any Muslim Founding Fathers.  He’s attempting to rewrite American history to one that simply does not exist. 

In reporting on Obama’s support of the mosque, Abby Phillip, writing in the Politico, attempted to say that only conservatives and 9-11 families are opposed to the proposed Ground Zero mosque.  She wrote,  

“President Barack Obama on Friday endorsed a controversial plan to build a mosque and Islamic center just blocks from Ground Zero in Manhattan, despite the strong objections of conservatives, the ADL and those who lost loved ones in the September 11 attacks.  …As perhaps the White House had anticipated, the reaction from conservatives and at least one 9/11 rescue worker was swift and angry.” 

Only conservatives are opposed to it?  That’s a load of bunk.  When a poll by the leftist CNN  shows 68 percent of respondents in America are against the mosque being built at Ground Zero, you know the actual figure is likely closer to 80 percent, maybe more.  In that poll, 54 percent of Democrats also opposed the mosque.  I guess the Politico didn’t get that memo, even though Ms. Phillip cited the CNN poll in her article.   

Strangely, Ms. Phillip’s article downplayed the number of deaths at Ground Zero, claiming that “more than 2000″ people were killed.  While that statement is technically true, it was just under 3000 people who were killed at Ground Zero, and some sources put the number of dead over 3000. Let’s not forget the 225 people killed at the Pentagon and in the Pennsylvania field.  Why would Ms. Phillip try to diminish the image of the number of people murdered on 9-11?  Does she somehow imagine that will make the Ground Zero mosque more palatable? 

On Wednesday, Obama sent out merry Ramadan wishes to the Muslim world.  He claimed that Ramadan, 

“…remind[s] us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”  

It is apparent that Barack Obama has no use for the truth.  That whole line is nothing but a big, fat lie.  When I think of justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings, the very last thing that comes to mind is Islam.  In fact, Islam is the antithesis of all those things!  Obama must really think we’re all a bunch of idiots out here–that if he says it, we’ll buy it.  Well that ain’t happening! 

So, it’s no surprise at all that Obama backs the proposed Ground Zero mosque.  This man is an enemy of our country, and it only stands to reason that he would side with our enemies.  This is just one more entry on Obama’s resume’ of anti-American “leadership.” 

Originally from Texas, Gina is a graduate of William Carey College in Gulfport, MS, with a Bachelor of Fine Arts. Gina currently presents an audio blog on News Radio 104.9 FM in Biloxi, MS. Her blogs can be heard twice weekly on the Kipp Gregory morning show.

 

Once again, out traitorous President Obama has given public support for members of the violent religion to build an Islamic center and mosque near New York’s ground zero. In a speech in which he defends the freedoms to worship, he ignores the freedoms to pursue a happy life and says about the violent religion, “Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country”. Oh by the way, their religious practice involves killing the rest of us who don’t believe in their terrorist profit Mohammed.

The following was written by Gina Miller. Her opinions don’t necessarily reflect those of ScottFactor.com, but because they’re here, they probably do.

(Editor’s Note: Since this article was written, the MTA has come down from the three-day drunk they must have been on and decided to run the ads. Gina’s article is very informative, so please keep reading!)

In New York, the inmates are running the asylum.  

Take Off The Blinders!

Pamela Geller, with the group Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) and the American Freedom Defense Initiative,  contracted with CBS Outdoor to place “Preservation of Ground Zero” advertisements against the proposed mosque at Ground Zero in New York on Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) buses.  She prepaid for the ad banners and submitted the copy of the ad design to CBS Outdoor.  The original copy and subsequent edits can be seen in Ms. Geller’s Atlas Shrugs article. 

The original ad featured a picture on the left of the twin towers in smoke and flames with a plane flying into them.  On the right was a tall building representing the proposed Ground Zero mosque with the Islamic symbol of a crescent and star on the top front of the building.  In between were the words, “September 11, 2001 WTC Jihad Attack” with a line and arrows connecting the words to, “September 11, 2011 WTC Mega Mosque.”  In between the two phrases above the line were the words, “Ground Zero,” and above that, in large type, the question, “Why there?”  At the bottom is the SIOA website. 

After submitting the ad to CBS Outdoor, Ms. Geller was contacted by Will Tingle of CBS and advised that MTA refused to run the bus ad, because the plane that appeared to be flying into the Twin Towers was “objectionable.”  Ms. Geller asked him why it was objectionable and what specific MTA advertising guideline the ad violated, and he could not say. 

To make a long story short, after submitting several revisions of the ad–first with the plane removed, then with the smoke and flames removed, then with the plane repositioned further away from the towers, and finally with nothing left but an undamaged image of the Twin Towers alone–MTA would still not approve the ad. 

So, on Friday, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who is also involved in both organizations with Ms. Geller, filed suit in U.S. District Court against the city of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority and MTA’s Chairman and CEO, Jay Walder for violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights.  The text of the suit is linked in the Atlas Shrugs article above.  Now, before you say, “Gina, MTA is a business that can choose to refuse any ad they like,” let me clarify that MTA is a governmental agency, not a privately owned company, and as such, is bound by state and federal laws and the Constitution. 

The lawsuit points out that MTA has previously accepted a wide variety of ads from commercial, non-commercial, public service, public issue, political and religious sources.  They have run ads from Jesus for Jews, Refuge From Islam, Muslims for Peace, and from an atheist group, the Big Apple Coalition of Reason.  There can be no argument that MTA only wants to avoid controversy–that’s for certain! 

What’s going on here?  What kind of power and money are behind this proposed mosque?  Who has Mayor Michael Bloomberg on a leash, and how is he kept there?  How can it be that the Manhattan Community Board and the city Landmarks Commission have almost unanimously contracted collective amnesia about 9-11 and eagerly voted to allow the mosque project to proceed?  This is insane! 

Did you know that 80 percent of the buildings on Park Place, where the Burlington Coat Factory building sits, have landmark status, and the others are pending?  Why would the Landmarks Commission arbitrarily deny landmark status to these two connected buildings, thus clearing the way for their demolition and the building of a 13 to 15 story monster mosque which overlooks the sacred American graveyard of Ground Zero?

If I didn’t know any better, I would think there’s a conspiracy to force the construction of this Muslim monument to the world of Islam’s victory at Ground Zero.  As a matter of fact, I don’t know any better, and can come up with no other reason for the rabid fast-tracking of this detestable project. 

There may be a possible bit of good news, however.  It came out on Sunday that the Muslim developers, Soho Properties, only own half of the two connected buildings at Park Place. The developers told officials and the public that they owned the entire parcel, but it turns out that they’re actually leasing half of it, which is owned by Con Edison Utility Company.  They’ve been acting under false pretense this whole time!  

The Manhattan Community Board and the Landmark Commission both voted to allow the mosque project to proceed based on false information.  This could cause the Islamists some problems, and let’s hope it does! 

These people won’t reveal the source of their funding either.  It’s supposedly going to take at least a hundred million dollars to build, and where will they get that money?  They’re not saying.  And we should expect them to be honest, why?  

This whole project is a sham—a slap in the face to America.  What we’ve been saying is true.  This is not, and never has been, about creating interfaith dialogue or “building bridges” as Feisal Rauf likes to say.  Those are lies of the Islamist enemies of America.  If built, this would always be a tower of Muslim triumph overlooking the site of American defeat at Ground Zero, and we should do all we can to stop it.

Originally from Texas, Gina is a graduate of William Carey College in Gulfport, MS, with a Bachelor of Fine Arts. Gina currently presents an audio blog on News Radio 104.9 FM in Biloxi, MS. Her blogs can be heard twice weekly on the Kipp Gregory morning show.

Greg Gutfeld

Every once in awhile an idea comes along that is worth mentioning to the masses. Conservative blogger Greg Gutfeld, author of the blog The Daily Gut, has a unique idea to help Muslims broaden their understanding of the world. It’s a bi-partisan effort that will support the people who are planning the Ground Zero mosque by strengthening ties to the local community. How does Mr. Gutfeld intend to do this?

By building a gay bar next door, of course.

Says Mr. Gutfeld:

So, the Muslim investors championing the construction of the new mosque near Ground Zero claim it’s all about strengthening the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world.

As an American, I believe they have every right to build the mosque – after all, if they buy the land and they follow the law – who can stop them?

Which is, why, in the spirit of outreach, I’ve decided to do the same thing.

I’m announcing tonight, that I am planning to build and open the first gay bar that caters not only to the west, but also Islamic gay men. To best express my sincere desire for dialogue, the bar will be situated next to the mosque Park51, in an available commercial space.

This is not a joke. I’ve already spoken to a number of investors, who have pledged their support in this bipartisan bid for understanding and tolerance.

As you know, the Muslim faith doesn’t look kindly upon homosexuality, which is why I’m building this bar. It is an effort to break down barriers and reduce deadly homophobia in the Islamic world.

The goal, however, is not simply to open a typical gay bar, but one friendly to men of Islamic faith. An entire floor, for example, will feature non-alcoholic drinks, since booze is forbidden by the faith. The bar will be open all day and night, to accommodate men who would rather keep their sexuality under wraps – but still want to dance.

Bottom line: I hope that the mosque owners will be as open to the bar, as I am to the new mosque. After all, the belief driving them to open up their center near Ground Zero, is no different than mine.

My place, however, will have better music.

If this idea isn’t a symbol of the ingenuity of Americans, I don’t know what is. After all, it is being billed as a multicultural center, and Mayor Bloomberg says we have to be open-minded and tolerant. So be it.

The following was written by Gina Miller. Her opinions don’t necessarily reflect those of ScottFactor.com, but because they’re here, they probably do. 

Terrorist On The Payroll!

The America-destroying insanity of the left continues unabated, as the Islamists and their sympathizers shamefully use our Constitution and Bill of Rights against us, and the wicked few in power facilitate their success in doing so.  

On Monday evening, I was listening to Jeff Kuhner, who was filling in for Michael Savage on the Savage Nation radio program, and Jeff was talking about a news story linked off of Dr. Savage’s website.  I almost dropped the dish I was washing when he said that the Fort Hood Muslim murderer, Nidal Hasan, who shot and killed 13 soldiers and one unborn baby and wounded 32 others, is still on the military payroll!  I was floored. 

After Hasan’s ghastly and treacherous attack last November, I put him out of my mind, assuming he would be dealt with swiftly and justly, but I should’ve known better.  From the first pull of the trigger, he officially declared himself an enemy combatant of America, and in a sane military, he would’ve been immediately stripped of his position as a major in the Army.  In my mind’s idea of a sane military, since the evidence of his evil deed was indisputable, he would have been given a speedy trial establishing his guilt, then he would have been summarily dispatched down to Allah.  It’s too bad those who took him down that day weren’t better shots, because we could’ve been spared further grief from this enemy of our country. 

So that was Monday evening.  Then on Tuesday, the news comes out that the New York City Landmarks Commission in lockstep with the Manhattan Community Board, denied landmark status to the Burlington Coat Factory building, thereby clearing the way for its demolition and construction of the new mosque tower of Muslim victory overlooking Ground Zero.  That’s two blows in two days against America. 

I’m sick of listening to pansy leftists clamoring about freedom of religion.  This is not a freedom of religion issue.  I realize that this group of Islamists who are champing at the bit to build this trophy mosque can “legally” build it if all laws, approvals, codes and whatever other red tape issues are in order.  Technically they can, but that doesn’t make it right.  These people behind this mosque are lying when they say they want this to be a center of multi-religious cooperation and education between Islam and the West.  That’s a lie, and they know it. 

There’s no reason that they must build there; in fact, there are almost 3000 reasons why they shouldn’t!  They’re making a bold statement of victory in the spot where Islam’s deluded followers murdered so many of our friends, family and fellow countrymen.  We will not forget that.  And I’m not going to back down from speaking the truth about this evil plan. 

These people are creeping their way into America’s system, and they’re well down the road to positioning themselves in establishing sharia law here in America.  They’ll do it bit by bit.  They’ll start by demanding special banking rules that apply only to them and are in line with sharia finance laws.  They’ll try to set court precedents by defending themselves against criminal activity by claiming what they did was not a crime, but their Islamic religious practices—freedom of religion, don’t you know, you dumb suckers!  We’ve seen numerous “honor” killings in our country already.  Don’t think for a minute this is going to get better with time. 

I know the people of this country have the will to resist and push back the Islamists, but I don’t believe those in power do, with only a few exceptions.  Just look at these two cases alone.  The Manhattan Community Board voted almost unanimously to allow the mosque project to proceed, and the Landmarks Commission voted unanimously not to stop them.  Mayor Michael Bloomberg, like a blind man, sees no problem with it whatsoever and insults those who oppose it.  The people in support of this despicable project try to downplay the opposition by implying only a few 9-11 families are against the proposed mosque.  That’s a load of garbage!  If we had nationwide polling on this issue, I would wager a staggeringly high number of Americans vehemently oppose this atrocious move by the Islamists. 

And what about Nidal Hasan?  Who are the yellow-bellied cowards high up in the military who have refused to immediately eject him from the service and who have postponed what should be an open and shut case?  I’m not a member of the military with knowledge of its inner workings, but I know when justice is being derailed.  When this murdering subhuman is still collecting $6000 a month and is still apparently eligible for a $15,000 a year “incentive pay” bonus, something is terribly wrong with the picture.  Has the leadership of our military lost its will to fight for what’s right?  What’s worse, is the dirt bag’s lawyer is complaining that his “client” is being discriminated against because banks are refusing to cash his paychecks.  Oh, the poor thing! 

It’s terribly outrageous that those in positions of power seem oblivious to the deviousness and the horrendous criminal activity of the Islamists that have infiltrated our society.  Are those in power actually afraid of the Islamists?  Is that what it is?  Or is this more of a business deal with them?  Don’t tick off the Saudis!  We like our business relationship!  Whatever the reason is for the leadership’s groveling before the Islamist lobby, it has to stop, or our goose will be cooked, and I’m not kidding. 

I’d better go ahead and wrap this thing up before I really say something.

Originally from Texas, Gina is a graduate of William Carey College in Gulfport, MS, with a Bachelor of Fine Arts. Gina currently presents an audio blog on News Radio 104.9 FM in Biloxi, MS. Her blogs can be heard twice weekly on the Kipp Gregory morning show.

Please go away.

Sincerely

Scott Factor

Thanks to Breitbart.TV for this enlightening piece…

And to that I say:

In Dearborn, Michigan muslims are allowed to have a festival that blocks off city streets…public streets…but you cannot distribute Christian material on those same streets.

I could understand concerns of police that want to keep peace if these guys were INSIDE the festival trying to do this, but they are OUTSIDE and on public streets. They were ordered by police to be at least 5 blocks away when distributing Christian material.

So, woman-beating and abusing muslim OK….Loving Christian not OK. Got it?

This week in the Washington Post, columnist Anthony Stevens-Arroyo wrote an interesting piece about immigration and the Catholic Church. Since that time, the headlines of MSM and the blogosphere have been peppered with similar subject lines;  “Catholic Scholar Says No Communion For Lawmakers Who Support Immigration Bill”, meaning the recently passed Arizona immigration laws and similar laws pending in other states. 

The premise of his contention was that the Vatican’s teaching of concern for what they consider to be dangerous current immigration policies should translate over to action by individual Cardinals of the Church. Since the Church has taken action previously, such as denying communion to politicians that support abortion rights, Stevens-Arroyo believes that they should also take a stand on the immigration issue. 

First, some background on me. My paternal grandfather was of Jewish faith. My paternal grandmother was Catholic and raised my father Catholic. My maternal grandfather was of Jewish faith and my maternal grandmother was an old-school Irish-Catholic. I was raised as a Catholic, with a clear understanding of the Jewish faith, as I watched my maternal grandfather practice many of the Jewish customs (I even learned a few dirty words in Hebrew, but that’s another story).  So, I am Catholic and I guess, qualified, to comment on Stevens-Arroyo’s misguided thinking. 

First, allow me to emphatically state a core belief I have about the church: If you are not willing to follow their rules, then get out. The Vatican, the Pope, is the ultimate authority in the Church. They make policy, rules, set direction, and administer those rules. They, unlike many other religions, have a chain of command for this administration. If you don’t support this chain of command, you should not be there.  Hence, the reason I am no longer there. 

It is my belief that the Church exists to teach the word of God. They are to minister to the masses, help those who can’t help themselves, set an example for others to follow, and show people the way to God’s love and eternal life. They can accomplish these goals in many ways, such as outreach missions, food kitchens, homeless shelters, and regularly scheduled church services and Bible worship. Politics, my friends, isn’t one of them. 

If Stevens-Arroyo thinks that the Church’s sacrament of communion should be used as a political weapon, maybe he should re-think that belief. Mr. Stevens-Arroyo should do his homework and read the Bible, Mathew 22:21 – “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”.  This passage, commonly quoted as a summary of the relationship between Christianity and government authority, came in response to a question of whether it was lawful for Jews to pay taxes to Caesar. It tries to address whether a Christian should submit to earthly authority. I think it is clear. 

The borders of the United States are clear. Our laws are clear. Immigration is illegal unless proper application is made and approval is granted. The Vatican, existing as a State, does not lawfully allow people to enter and stay, squatting on Vatican property. Both are laws of man, and as the Bible directs, both should be rendered just as God’s laws are rendered. 

Whiles some might read this message of mine and argue that the Bible also states to love thy neighbor, be clear that love is a vague term defined in many ways. While I am capable of loving my neighbor, giving him my land is not part of that love, no more than love was any part of what some Catholic priests did to some vulnerable children. In those cases, the Church demonstrated its unwillingness to give to Caesar by giving up those priests that had committed these disgusting acts. Rather, they transferred them to different parishes and covered up the crime. The Church didn’t deny Communion to those disgusting criminals; rather, it continued to let those very criminals deliver the sacrament. Why are you not crusading against that, Mr. Stevens-Arroyo? 

The fact is, until the Church is done cleaning the dirt out from under its own carpet, it should wisely refrain from treading on that of another. It apparently has chosen to do so on this immigration issue. So until such time that the Church gives marching orders to its Cardinals to denounce the immigration law, it’s my suggestion to Mr. Stevens-Arroyo that he has a responsibility to follow the teachings of the Church, or he has a responsibility to get out.

Search
Custom Search
Wanna Help?
We The People!
  • #518 - God Will Cause You to Remain
    Jesus said in John 15, "I am the vine; you are the branches. If you abide in Me, you will bear much fruit and your fruit will remain." In life, you may face bumps in the road. You may have had a lot of ups and downs, struggles in finances, or difficulties in relationships that have lasted year after year. You're thinking, "Is it ever goin […]
Referral List